Alternative
Dispute Resolution Consortium
Info for Union
Officials
Union Officials say this about Mediation:
"Our union uses this program whenever possible because it works so well in
resolving grievances:
- Mediation seems to better address the root
causes of workplace problems.
- I was impressed with the ADR Consortium mediators’ skills in facilitating
an open exchange between the employee and manager, as a first step in finding
resolution.
- I observed even "difficult" managers behave more flexibly and be more
willing to compromise during mediations.
- After mediations, I notice fewer repeat grievances against the same
managers, thanks to improved communication.
- Mediations increase union productivity.
- Out of about 10 mediation cases, nine were resolved in a few weeks, with a
maximum of one day's time spent by each party.
- Using mediation, the union can help more employees by not getting tied up
with a few time-consuming cases.
- ADR Consortium mediators are free.
- The union pays nothing.
- Our agency pays only local mileage and parking costs.
- The agency lending the ADR Consortium mediator pays its own
employee's salary.
- The union may attend the mediation session and speak on the employee’s
behalf.
- ADR Consortium
mediators address the
employees’ interests and do not impose a solution, like a judge does.
- If the mediation does not resolve the case, the union still has legal
remedies available, so it has nothing to lose trying mediation.
- Since there is no loser in mediation, the union does not risk losing face
and marring its success rate.
- ADR Consortium mediators are professional.
- The ADR Consortium mediators I observed were well-trained and very
effective.
- Both sides trusted their objectivity.
- Because ADR Consortium mediators come from another agency, both parties
trust the confidentiality of the proceeding more."